NOTICE RE IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP Ens Legis

FCA PUBLIC NOTICE

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

SERVED ON MAY 6TH 2024.

RESPONDENT JUDGE BAUMGARTEN OF SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT THE DIRECTORS OF THE FCA, PIETRO BOFFA, NICK CLARK, MATTHEW STONE, ALISTAIR MACKENZIE

1.

i :iain-clifford:stamp acting Sui Juris am a living man with unalienable rights under God and act as the Authorised Representative of IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP the Legal Person.

2.

i have Dominion and unalienable rights and undisputed jurisdiction over Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP

3.

i am the sole shareholder in IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP LTD 15132951, IAIN STAMP LTD, I C STAMP LTD 15133342, I STAMP LTD 5132822 and hold Copyright and Trademark over the name IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP and all derivatives of the name.

4.

i have also corrected i’s status in accordance with Cestui Que Vie Act 1707 with the UK Coroner, i have returned from the sea, reclaimed my dominion rights, i’s estate and am not dead.

5.

i am a Secured Party and Creditor having filed a lien over the Cestui Que Vie trust Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP with trust reference number NH 43 80 40 D, i am not a ward of the Crown Incorporated or Southwark Crown court.

6.

i rebutted the 12 Presumptions of the private Bar Guild within i’s Notice of Understanding Intend and Claim of Right served on the King and Prime Minister in May 2023:

  1. 1. Public Record
  2. 2. Public Service
  3. 3. Public Oath
  4. 4. Immunity
  5. 5. Summons
  6. 6. Custody
  7. 7. Court of Guardians
  8. 8. Court of Trustees
  9. 9. Government as Executor/Beneficiary
  10. 10. Agent and Agency
  11. 11. Incompetence
  12. 12. Guilt
7.

As a sentient Man, i have the right to justice under the Magna Carta Articles 39 and 40.

m) “No free man shall be seized, imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed, exiled or ruined in any way, nor in any way proceeded against, except by the lawful alleged Judgement of his peers and the law of the land”.

n) “To no one will we sell to no one will we deny or delay right or justice.”

8.

i have sworn an Oath to the Barons that invoked Magna Carta Article 61 in 2001, i have lawful excuse to distress the Crown as no Acts and Statutes have received Royal Assent since 2001 and have no standing in law and to comply with any Acts and Statutes that allegedly received Royal Assent since 2001 i would be committing an Act of Treason.

9.

i served a supplemental NOTICE on the alleged Judge Baumgarten and The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (a UK Corporation) 3rd April 2024 with the following requirements:

9.

i served a supplemental NOTICE on the alleged Judge Baumgarten and The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (a UK Corporation) 3rd April 2024 with the following requirements:

REQUIREMENTS UNDER NOTICE 3RD APRIL 2024

10.

“i require any one of the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 on the Respondents or their authorised representative to produce unequivocal evidence by 3rd May 2024 that:

  1. Magna Carta Article 61 was not invoked in 2001, and that i do not have lawful excuse to distress the Crown and that all Acts and Statutes have received Royal Assent since 2001 and are valid at law including FSMA 2000 and Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA).
  2. that the United Kingdom Incorporated, or the Crown Corporation, or the FCA, or Southwark Crown Court and or alleged Judge Baumgarten have superior title as the Secured Party over Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP and are the Holders in Due Course of the credit issued by Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP
  3. that the FCA (a corporation) has jurisdictional powers to investigate the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP despite the invocation of Magna Carta Article 61 in 2001.
  4. that Pietro Boffa is an impartial first-hand and reliable witness to the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP providing “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers”.
  5. that Pietro Boffa is an impartial first-hand and reliable independent witness to the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP living a criminal lifestyle.
  6. that Southwark Crown Court as a corporation has jurisdictional powers to issue Warrants against the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP despite the invocation of Magna Carta Article 61 in 2001.
  7. i’s rebuttal of the 12 Bar Guild Presumptions in May 2023 has no standing in law.
  8. that alleged Judge Baumgarten was not conflicted by his Public and BAR Guild Oaths and did provide i with unalienable and Dominion rights under Magna Carta 1215 and had the requisite powers and acceptance from i to move the matter of Order 34 into the private administrative proceedings of the BAR Guild.
  9. that the Warrants of arrest and confiscation of Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP bank accounts under Order 34 were issued and signed by the alleged Judge Baumgarten in the presence of a reliable witness and were executed in the English language and were signed by alleged Judge Baumgarten following sworn first-hand, impartial and reliable witness knowledge from Pietro Boffa that the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP had provided “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” and
    was living a criminal lifestyle.
  10. that the FCA, Southwark Crown Court and alleged Judge Baumgarten have jurisdiction over the activities of Members (as either individuals or as body corporates) of the unincorporated Private Members Association MATRIXFREEDOM.
  11. that the FCA immediately produces its unequivocal evidence that the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP did provide and does provide “claims management,
    debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” and is/was living a criminal lifestyle.
  12. that the FCA immediately produce its unequivocal evidence that any Member of MATRIXFREEDOM did provide or does provide “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” and is/was living a criminal lifestyle”.

i’s TERMS OF CONTRACTUAL OFFER UNDER NOTICE 3RD APRIL 2024

11.

“i :iain-Clifford: stamp make by way of this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on the Respondents on 1st April 2024 these terms of offer to contract.

12.

i’s terms are communicated at the moment they are received by the offeror. In other words, acceptance becomes effective not merely when communicated but when received by the offeror as per Lord Denning in the case of Entores V Miles Far East Corporation (1955)2 QB 327, further:

  1. i’s terms of acceptance by post, telegram etc. is complete the moment a letter, is properly addressed and stamped is placed in post office main box as per Adams v Lindsell (1818) B & A LD 681 non neg.
13.

Should the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 and in accordance with the terms herein fail to provide to i all the items listed between point 17a through 17k by 03rd May 2024 then the Respondents are in breach of i’s terms and offer to contract and via the Respondents breach of contract admit that the Respondents do not have any evidence and cannot prove the items listed between point 17a through 17k to be true and no evidence exists and further admit liability for the trespass and harm caused to i and the Respondents breach of the peace.

14.

Should the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 and in accordance with the terms herein fail to provide to i all the items listed between point 17a through 17k by 03rd May 2024 then the Respondents are Estopped from bringing any evidence detailed between point 17a through 17k”.

BREACH OF TERMS – EQUITABLE ESTOPPLE

15.

The FCA failed to comply with i’s requirements as listed at point 17 a through i of the supplemental NOTICE of 3rd April 2024 and are in breach of i’s terms and offer to contract and via the FCA’s breach of contract admit that the FCA do not have any evidence and cannot prove the items listed between point 17a through 17k of the supplemental NOTICE served on the FCA on 03rd May 2024 to be true as no evidence exists and further admit liability for the trespass and harm caused to i and the FCA’s breach of the peace.

16.

The alleged Judge Baumgarten failed to comply with i’s requirements as listed at point 17 a through i of the supplemental NOTICE of 3rd April 2024 and is in breach of i’s terms and offer to contract and via the breach of contract admits that the alleged Judge Baumgarten did presume that i had accepted his offer to contract and moved the case into the Public jurisdiction of the BAR Guild and created a Constructive Trust (Order 34 Southwark Crown Court) and appointed Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP as the Trustee and by doing so breached his Public Oath. 

3rd MAY 2024 – FCA OFFER TO CONTRACT

17.

The FCA emailed a letter, a witness statement purported to be written by Pietro Boffa and a Draft variation order that appears to relate to Order 34 Southwark Crown Court. The letter says

  1. “You will note that the FCA has served this application upon you in the first instance, before approaching the Court. This is to enquire if you consent to the variation. If you object the FCA will approach the Court to seek a hearing, otherwise we will request that this matter is dealt with administratively”
18.

i do not consent to any variation of the Alleged Order 34 Southwark Crown Court or to any of the FCA’s requirements as Order 34 Southwark Crown Court Order is ultra virus and void ab initio as detailed in points 2 to 11 of the NOTICE served on the FCA on 3rd April 2024.

19.

The draft order says:

  1. The wording on the Penal Notice at page 1 of the Order is varied with the addition of “disobey this Order” which shall be inserted after “STAMP,” and before “may…” so that the first sentence of the Penal Notice shall now read; “If you Ian Clifford STAMP, disobey this Order you may be held in contempt of court and may be imprisoned, fined or have your assets seized.”
  2. 1 2. There shall be inserted into the Restraint Order a new paragraph 5A which shall be headed “Provision of Information” which shall state; “PROVISION OF INFORMATION 5A 1. The Alleged Offender must serve a witness statement verified by a statement of truth on the FCA within 28 days of the date of service of this Order on him setting out all his assets and all assets under his control whether in or outside England and Wales and whether in his own name or not and whether solely or jointly owned, giving the value of his interests in, location and details of all such assets.
  3. 2. The information in the witness statement referred to in paragraph 5A1 above must
    include:
    1. a. the name and address of all persons including financial institutions holding any such assets;
    2. b. details of all income, whether declared or undeclared for tax purposes and whether in the UK or overseas, including details of employment from 7th June 2017 identifying the amounts paid, by whom they are paid and the account or accounts into which such sums are paid
    3. c. details of all motor vehicles owned or possessed, whether held in the Alleged Offender’s sole name, jointly with others or in which the Alleged Offender has an interest;
    4. d. details of all bank accounts held by or under the control of the Alleged Offender in her sole name or jointly with others or held by anyone on her behalf or in relation to which the Alleged Offender is an authorised signatory, since 7th June 2017, together with the name and address of the place where the account is held and the sums in the account;
    5. e. details (including addresses) of any real property anywhere in the world in which the Alleged Offender has any interest since 7th June 2017 whether held in his sole name or jointly with others or held by anyone on his behalf, including an interest in any of the net proceeds of sale if the 2 property were to be sold, such details must include details of any mortgage or charge on the property;
    6. f. details of all National Savings Certificates, unit trusts, shares, equities securities, bonds or debentures held in any company or corporation wherever incorporated in the world, owned or controlled by the Alleged Offender or in which he has an interest since 7th June 2017;
    7. g. details of all safety deposit boxes held anywhere in the world, whether held in the Alleged Offender’s sole name, jointly with others or in relation to which the Alleged Offender has or has had authorised access since 7th June 2017;
    8. h. details of all trusts of which the Alleged Offender is a beneficiary, including the name and address of every trustee and the name of any co-beneficiary if
      applicable;
    9. i. j. details of all company secretary appointments, company directorships, non-executive directorships, and other company appointments that the Alleged Offender has held anywhere in the world; details of any limited company assets whether in the UK or anywhere in the world in relation to which the Alleged Offender is a director, the majority shareholder, or has a controlling interest in that company since 7th June 2017;
    10. k. details of the Alleged Offender’s current employment status.
    11. l. particulars of any income or debt due to the Alleged Offender including the name and address of the debtor;
    12. m. details of all other realisable assets believed to be over £1,000 in value held by the Alleged Offender whether in his sole name, jointly with others or in relation to which the Alleged Offender has an interest, anywhere in the world;
    13. n. details of all assets over £500 in value transferred by the Alleged Offender or anyone on his behalf, to individuals and businesses in the past 6 years,
      identifying the name and address of all persons and businesses to whom such property was transferred;
    14. o. details of all the Alleged Offender’s current financial liabilities; 3
    15. p. in the event any Claim Form, Petition, Statutory Demand, Application Notice, Enforcement Notice, Seizure Notice or any other civil court process is pending or is at any time during the currency of this Order served upon him or brought to his attention, the Alleged Offender shall forthwith provide a copy of the process to the Prosecutor;
    16. q. details of any cryptocurrency or tokens stored in non-custodial wallets including details of the wallet provider, the public addresses of any cryptocurrency or tokens where value is stored, value held at the addresses, how the wallets are accessed, whether anybody else has access to the wallets and, if so, where they are stored for any wallets held anywhere in the world whether held by the Alleged Offender in his sole name or jointly with others or held by anyone on his behalf or in relation to which the Alleged Offender is an authorised signatory since 7th June 2017.
    17. 3. For the avoidance of doubt, the Alleged Offender has a continuing duty to disclose all his income and assets and all assets under his control, including any new assets acquired by the Alleged Offender after this Order takes effect. He must notify the FCA in writing of any interest in any asset acquired by him after the making of this Order within 14 days of acquiring such an interest. 5B 5C Subject to any further order of the Court any information given in compliance with this Order shall only be used –
    18. a) for the purpose of these proceedings;
    19. b) if the Alleged Offender is charged and is convicted, for the purposes of any confiscation hearing that may take place; and
    20. c) if a confiscation order is made, for the purposes of enforcing that order, including any receivership proceedings. Paragraph 5B does not prevent the FCA or counsel instructed by the FCA from considering any information disclosed in compliance with this Order for the purposes of discharging the FCA’s disclosure obligations in any 4 criminal proceedings (to which these proceedings are ancillary) whether under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 or the common law SAVE THAT in the absence of a further order from the Court, there shall be no disclosure of any material disclosed in compliance with this order to any co-Alleged Offender in subsequent criminal proceedings. However, nothing in this paragraph shall make inadmissible any disclosure made by the Alleged Offender in any criminal proceedings for perjury relating to that disclosure.”
    21. 3. The below Repatriation Order shall be inserted as paragraph 5D of the Order; “REPATRIATION 5D 1. The Alleged Offender must: a) within 14 days after being asked to do so in writing by the FCA bring any moveable asset in respect of which he has an interest, which is outside England and Wales, to a location within England and Wales; and b) inform the FCA of 12 Endeavour Square, London, E20 1JN of the location within England and Wales within 7 days of the arrival of the assets. If the asset is cash or credit in an overseas financial institution, it must be paid into an interest-bearing account in England and Wales and the account holder, location and account number be notified to the FCA, as above, within 7 days.”
20.

The FCA brought fraud on the court in obtaining Order 34 Southwark Crown Court by
presenting:

  1. no evidence to support their speculation that Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP may have breached the General Prohibition despite having investigated the activities of IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP since early 2021.
  2. that IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP lives a criminal lifestyle and had received in excess of £1m from the proceeds of crime, when there was no evidence that any crime had been committed and that Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP had received directors’ loans and no earnings from his UK companies as can be evidenced in the company’s books and records.
21.

Alleged Judge Baumgarten failed to provide any evidence that he was not conflicted by his Public and BAR Guild Oaths as detailed in the NOTICE of 3rd April 2024 and did not provide i with unalienable and Dominion rights under Magna Carta 1215 in the Ex Parte hearing and did presume that i accepted the courts jurisdiction and did not have the requisite powers by way of acceptance from i to move the matter of Order 34 into the private administrative proceedings of the BAR Guild.

22.

i did not, would not have and do not accept the position of Trustee of Order 34 Southwark Crown Court and say alleged Judge Baumgarten is the Trustee.

  1. i now claim my body and collapse the Cestui Que Vie Constructive Trust which you have charged, as there is no value in it. Judge Baumgarten has committed fraud against all laws.

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS IN A COMMON LAW COURT

23.

Should the FCA proceed with its proposed variation to the void order known as Order 34 Southwark Crown Court and should alleged Judge Baumgarten or Southwark Crown Court or any other court grant the FCA the proposed variation via an administrative process i will add these wrongs into the charges of trespass, harm, and breach of the peace and present them to a jury in a Common Law Court and seek conviction as detailed in the NOTICE of 3rd April 2024.