NOTICE

RE IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP Ens Legis

FCA PUBLIC NOTICE

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

SERVED ON APRIL 03rd, 2024.

RESPONDENTS:

PIETRO BOFFA, NICK CLARK, MATTHEW STONE, AND ALL DIRECTORS OF THE FCA ALLEDGED JUDGE BAUMGARTEN

THIS NOTICE WILL PE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE AT

www.matrixfreedom.org

STATUS AND STANDING OF i :iain-clifford: stamp

1.

i :iain-clifford: stamp am the Appointed Representative for Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP and the beneficial owner of IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP Ltd.

2.

i have Dominion and unalienable rights and undisputed jurisdiction over Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP.

3.

i :iain-clifford: stamp am a creditor of the bankruptcy of United States Incorporated that went into bankruptcy in 1933.

4.

i :iain-clifford: stamp am a creditor of the bankruptcy of United Kingdom Incorporated that went into bankruptcy in 1938.

5.

i am the Holder in Due Course of all credit issued as per U.C.C. 3-302 including the issued credit under Order 34.

6.

i am the sole shareholder in IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP LTD 15132951, IAIN STAMP LTD, I C STAMP LTD 15133342, I STAMP LTD 5132822 and hold Copyright and Trademark over the name IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP and all derivatives of the name.

7.

i have Dominion and Unalienable Rights under Natural Law and Magna Carta 1215.

8.

Canon 3228 (vi): i am not “corporate property or a thing” and Southwark Crown Court is not and was not an elected as a “Custodian” of Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP as an artificial corporate person with NH 43 80 40 D in the constructive trust know as Order 34.

9.

i corrected i’s status with the King, Prime Minister and Secretary of State via a Notice of Understanding Intent and Claim of Right in May 2023.

10.

i have also corrected i’s status in accordance with Cestui Que Vie Act 1707 with the UK Coroner, i have returned from the sea, reclaimed my dominion rights, i’s estate and am not dead.

11.

i am a Secured Party and Creditor having filed a lien over the Cestui Que Vie trust Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP with trust reference number NH 43 80 40 D, i am not a ward of the Crown Incorporated or Southwark Crown court.

12.

i rebutted the 12 Presumptions of the private Bar Guild within i’s Notice of Understanding Intend and Claim of Right served on the King and Prime Minister in May 2023:

  1. 1. Public Record
  2. 2. Public Service
  3. 3. Public Oath
  4. 4. Immunity
  5. 5. Summons
  6. 6. Custody
  7. 7. Court of Guardians
  8. 8. Court of Trustees
  9. 9. Government as Executor/Beneficiary
  10. 10. Agent and Agency
  11. 11. Incompetence
  12. 12. Guilt
14.

As a sentient Man, i have the right to justice under the Magna Carta Articles 39 and 40.

  1. “No free man shall be seized, imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed, exiled or ruined in any way, nor in any way proceeded against, except by the lawful alleged Judgement of his peers and the law of the land”.
  2. “To no one will we sell to no one will we deny or delay right or justice.”
15.

i have sworn an Oath to the Barons that invoked Magna Carta Article 61 in 2001, i have lawful excuse to distress the Crown as no Acts and Statutes have received Royal Assent since 2001 and have no standing in law and to comply with any Acts and Statutes that allegedly received Royal Assent since 2001 i would be committing an Act of Treason.

15.

As a sentient Man i have a right of trial by a jury of i’s peers in a Court of record under Common Law.

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE

TO NOTICE OF 01.04.2024 AS SERVED ON THE RESPONDENTS

1.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) operating as a UK Corporation commenced an investigation in March 2022 into an Unincorporated Private Members Association called MATRIXFREEDOM and The Ens Legis Mr IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP.

2.

Pietro Boffa assisted the FCA in securing the Ex Parte Order No 34 from Southwark Crown Court on 7th June 2023. In various witness statements Pietro Boffa says about himself:

  1. A Financial Investigator accredited under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 as amended (“POCA”) and an Associate at the Financial Conduct Authority (“the FCA”) at 12 Endeavour Square, London, E20 1JN.
3.

The FCA and alleged Judge Baumgarten of Southwark Crown Court appear to substantially rely on the statements made by Pietro Boffa in various witness statements Pietro Boffa attests to.

4.

The FCA's presumed that it had jurisdiction to investigate under section 168 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA), which due to the invocation of Article 61 of the Magna Carta unlawfully purports to provide the FCA powers to appoint investigators to conduct investigations on its behalf where there are circumstances suggesting that an offence under FSMA or specific provisions of other legislation may have been committed.

5.

In May 2023, the FCA’s made an Ex Parte application to alleged Judge Baumgarten of Southwark Crown Court (a UK Corporation), and relied on purported witness evidence from Pietro Boffa, the FCA stated:

  1. “The investigation is into whether individuals including Mr Stamp and corporate entities are conducting regulated activities country to section 19 and 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA).
  2. The activities under investigation relate to claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers”.
  3. “The FCA also consider that misleading statement to consumers have been made country to section 89 of FSMA (para 16-17)” c. Mr Stamp has obtained over £1m in connection with the offending from the MF-PMA group of companies. d. That Mr Stamp lives a criminal lifestyle. e. There is a real risk of dissipation.”
6.

Utilising the purported witness statements provided by Pietro Boffa the FCA persuaded alleged Judge Baumgarten of Southwark Crown Court to issue an unlawful due to the invocation of Article 61 of the Magna Carta a Court Order No 34 2023 on 7th June 2023.

  1. The witness statements of Pietro Boffa contain a wide range of untruths about Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP and do not detail any evidence that Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP had or is providing “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” in breach of the unlawful due to the invocation of Article 61 of the Magna Carta FSMA 2000 or POCA 2002, described by the FCA as a breach of the General Prohibition.
    1. It is denied that Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP provides “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers”,
    2. It is further denied that Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP
      lives a criminal lifestyle.
    3. It is further denied that there was any risk of asset dissipation should Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP become aware of the FCA investigation.
7.

Amongst other things Order 34 unlawfully due to the invocation of Article 61 of the Magna Carta constrains all bank account in the name of the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP.

8.

Unlawfully due to the invocation of Article 61 of the Magna Carta Southwark Crown Court Order 34 was granted, and Arrest and search Warrants were issued.

9.

The FCA presumes to have the required jurisdiction to:

  1. Investigate Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP.
  2. Constrain the bank accounts of Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP.
  3. Add warning NOTICES to its website designed to destroy the reputation of the UK companies operated by Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP.
10.

Despite constant surveillance of Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP since 2010 and more specifically from the early part of 2021 in relation to the unincorporated Private Members Association MATRIXFREEDOM the FCA’s alleged investigation continues with no evidence of the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP providing “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” nor has the FCA brought ant charges against the
Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP.

11.

Despite numerous offers made by :iain-clifford: stamp to the FCA to bring forward any evidence of its presumed jurisdiction over Ens Legis IAIN CLIFORD STAMP and any evidence of the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP providing “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” the FCA has failed to do so.

i REQUIRE

17.

i require any one of the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 on the Respondents or their authorised representative to produce unequivocal evidence by 3rd May 2024 that:

  1. Magna Carta Article 61 was not invoked in 2001, and that i do not have lawful excuse to distress the Crown and that all Acts and Statutes have received Royal Assent since 2001 and are valid at law including FSMA 2000 and Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA).
  2. that the United Kingdom Incorporated, or the Crown Corporation, or the FCA, or Southwark Crown Court and or alleged Judge Baumgarten have superior title as the Secured Party over Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP and are the Holders in Due Course of the credit issued by Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP.
  3. that the FCA (a corporation) has jurisdictional powers to investigate the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP despite the invocation of Magna Carta Article 61 in 2001.
  4. that Pietro Boffa is an impartial first-hand and reliable witness to the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP providing “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers”.
  5. that Pietro Boffa is an impartial first-hand and reliable independent witness to the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP living a criminal lifestyle.
  6. that Southwark Crown Court as a corporation has jurisdictional powers to issue Warrants against the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP despite the invocation of Magna Carta Article 61 in 2001.
  7. i’s rebuttal of the 12 Bar Guild Presumptions in May 2023 has no standing in law.
  8. that alleged Judge Baumgarten was not conflicted by his Public and BAR Guild Oaths and did provide i with unalienable and Dominion rights under Magna Carta 1215 and had the requisite powers and acceptance from i to move the matter of Order 34 into the private administrative proceedings of the BAR Guild.
  9. that the Warrants of arrest and confiscation of Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP bank accounts under Order 34 were issued and signed by the alleged Judge Baumgarten in the presence of a reliable witness and were executed in the English language and were signed by alleged Judge Baumgarten following sworn first-hand, impartial and reliable witness knowledge from Pietro Boffa that the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP had provided “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” and was living a criminal lifestyle.
  10. that the FCA, Southwark Crown Court and alleged Judge Baumgarten have jurisdiction over the activities of Members (as either individuals or as body corporates) of the unincorporated Private Members Association MATRIXFREEDOM.
  11. that the FCA immediately produces its unequivocal evidence that the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP did provide and does provide “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” and is/was living a criminal lifestyle.
  12. that the FCA immediately produce its unequivocal evidence that any Member of MATRIXFREEDOM did provide or does provide “claims management, debt counselling and making unauthorised financial promotions to UK consumers” and is/was living a criminal lifestyle.

Add Your Heading Text Here

18.
i :iain-Clifford: stamp make by way of this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on the Respondents on 1st April 2024 these terms of offer to contract.
19.

i’s terms are communicated at the moment they are received by the offeror. In other words, acceptance becomes effective not merely when communicated but when received by the offeror as per Lord Denning in the case of Entores V Miles Far East Corporation (1955)2 QB 327, further:

  1. i’s terms of acceptance by post, telegram etc. is complete the moment a letter, is properly addressed and stamped is placed in post office main box as per Adams v Lindsell (1818) B & A LD 681 non neg.
20.

Should the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 and in accordance with the terms herein fail to provide to i all the items listed between point 17a through 17k by 03rd May 2024 then the Respondents are in breach of i’s terms and offer to contract and via the Respondents breach of contract admit that the Respondents do not have any evidence and cannot prove the items listed between point 17a through 17k to be true and no evidence exists and further admit liability for the trespass and harm caused to i and the Respondents breach of the peace.

21.

Should the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 and in accordance with the terms herein fail to provide to i all the items listed between point 17a through 17k by 03rd May 2024 then the Respondents are Estopped from bringing any evidence detailed between point 17a through 17k.

22.

Should the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 on the Respondents or any other alleged authority charge the Ens Legis IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP or :iain-clifford: stamp with an offence or offences under FSMA 2000 or POCA 2002 or any other Act or Statute either prior to or after 03rd May 2024 i will convene a Common Law Court (as a court of record) and i will charge the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE issued on 1st April 2024 with trespass, breach of the peace and breach of contract and put the Respondents on trial under a Common Law Court to prove their innocence to i’s charges of Trespass, harm, breach of the peace and breach of contract.

23.

Should the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 on the Respondents take part in a Common Law Court process and are found guilty by a Jury of 12 of the wrongs of Trespass, harm, breach of the peace and breach of contract the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 agree to pay restitution to i of £100,000,000 each and the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 agree to any terms i deem appropriate to secure the Respondents debt to i by the Respondents acceptance of a commercial lien filed via UCC1 and supporting financing statement against their public and private estates.

24.

Should, following i’s charge against the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on the Respondents on 1st April 2024 not take part in the Common Law Court process, the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on the Respondents on 1st April 2024 will be duly convicted of the wrongs of trespass, harm, breach of the peace and breach of contract against i and duly accept and consent to a commercial lien filed against their public and private estates via a UCC1 lien and the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on the Respondents on 1st April 2024 agree to pay restitution to i of £100,000,000 each and the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 agree to any terms i deem appropriate to secure the Respondents debt to i by the Respondents acceptance of a commercial lien filed via UCC1 and supporting financing statement against their public and private estates.

25.

In the event of i filing a commercial lien via UCC1 and appropriate financing statement against the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 public and private estates the Respondents to this NOTICE and the NOTICE served on 1st April 2024 agree and consent for the US Department of Treasury to collect the Respondents lien debt against the Respondents public and private estates.